•  
  •  
 

Volume 1, Number 1 (2006) Liberty and Equality: Conflicting Values in the Public Schools of a Liberal Democratic Society

PROLOGUE

Editor: This inaugural issue is dedicated to Maxine Greene, my mentor and teacher, and truly a philosopher who is a “light in dark times”* and the inspiration behind this journal. Professor Greene was invited to write a prologue for this issue as a framework for understanding the meaning and purpose of this journal as a voice in the modern world. She reminds us that we must bring more to the pages of our journal than analytical reasoning if we indeed want to embrace the uncertainties, tensions, and controversies of our time in ways that maintain our humanity and avoid falling into simplistic answers that give us a comfortable but illusionary certainty.

*from the book, A Light in Dark Times: Maxine Greene and the Unfinished Conversation

Editorial

Prologue

PDF

From Jagged Landscapes to Possibility
Maxine Greene
Vol. 1, Iss. 1

Introductory Essays

PDF

The Merits of Controversy
Shelby Sheppard
Vol. 1, Iss. 1


Theme: Some Thoughts on the Nature of Controversy

PDF

Keeping The Constitution Inside The Schoolhouse Gate - Students' Rights Thirty Years After Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Nadine Strossen and Daniel Larner
Vol. 1, Iss. 1


Theme: Some Thoughts on the Nature of Student Rights

Articles in Response to Controversy

PDF

Helping Students to Think
Nel Noddings
Vol. 1, Iss. 1

PDF

Saxe as an Erosion of Individual Protections
Marc Claude-Charles Colitti
Vol. 1, Iss. 1

About the Authors

PDF

About the Authors

Vol. 1, Iss. 1

Rejoinders

Controversy Addressed in this Issue:

Many of the tensions in public school policies are deeply rooted in the tensions inherent in the philosophy of a liberal democratic state. For example, while we seek to promote values like equality and liberty, there are times when these values conflict. In a recent court decision, Saxe v. State College Area School District, the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a school district’s anti-harassment policy as a violation of the first amendment. The policy was intended to provide a safe, secure, and nurturing school environment for all students, including gay and lesbian students, to achieve equal educational opportunities. The plaintiffs in the case argued that their religion compelled them to speak out against what they considered the harmful and sinful nature of homosexuality, and argued that the school policy was a constitutional violation of their free speech and free exercise of their religion.

To read the decision go to: Saxe v. State College Area School District or http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/cases/clcc.html?court=3rd&navby=case&no=994081