Event Title

Implementing the 2014 Puget Sound Pressure Assessment

Presentation Abstract

The Puget Sound Partnership has undertaken a major project to evaluate pressures on the Sound’s marine, nearshore, freshwater, and terrestrial resources, and identify the critical ecosystem vulnerabilities that should be addressed to ensure sustainable long-term protection and recovery. The project is one of the priority science actions in the 2011-13 biennial science work plan, and was led by the Partnership’s Science Panel. The purpose of the 2014 Puget Sound Pressure Assessment is to create a more systematic and regionally accepted understanding of the pressures on the Puget Sound ecosystem and how and where the ecosystem is vulnerable to these pressures. It is intended to inform future decisions about what actions are most needed and how best to undertake Puget Sound protection and recovery. Vulnerability was assessed for stressor - ecosystem endpoint pairs by eliciting expert judgments about the functional impact, recovery time, and resistance of stressor effects on endpoints. Stressor intensity and endpoint distribution were separately characterized using either elicited expert judgments or GIS analysis as appropriate. Stressors represent documented, proximate causes of environmental change that capture a topic of concern identified in the Action Agenda or other applicable landscape assessment. Stressors included in this assessment were consistent with those presented in Puget Sound pressure taxonomy. Ecosystem endpoints are components or attributes of the ecosystem. Ecosystem endpoints were selected for three domains (terrestrial, freshwater, marine-nearshore). Vulnerability was assessed by eliciting expert judgments about and the strength of stressors expressed in geographic assessment units. Assessment units included 16 watersheds (using the areas defined for Chinook recovery planning) and seven marine basins (as defined by the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project). . Results calculated as potential impact of stressors, on endpoints, for individual assessment units can be combined in manifold ways to provide information about common themes and geographic differences in critical vulnerabilities. This presentation will share lessons learned from this complex project and assessment results

Session Title

Session S-02F: Presssure and Risk Assessment Tools

Conference Track

Planning Assessment & Communication

Conference Name

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (2014 : Seattle, Wash.)

Document Type

Event

Start Date

30-4-2014 1:30 PM

End Date

30-4-2014 3:00 PM

Location

Room 602-603

Genre/Form

conference proceedings; presentations (communicative events)

Contributing Repository

Digital content made available by University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Subjects – Topical (LCSH)

Marine ecosystem management--Washington (State)--Puget Sound

Subjects – Names (LCNAF)

Puget Sound Partnership

Geographic Coverage

Puget Sound (Wash.)--Environmental conditions; Salish Sea (B.C. and Wash.)--Environmental conditions

Rights

This resource is displayed for educational purposes only and may be subject to U.S. and international copyright laws. For more information about rights or obtaining copies of this resource, please contact University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9103, USA (360-650-7534; heritage.resources@wwu.edu) and refer to the collection name and identifier. Any materials cited must be attributed to the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference Records, University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Type

Text

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

This document is currently not available here.

COinS
 
Apr 30th, 1:30 PM Apr 30th, 3:00 PM

Implementing the 2014 Puget Sound Pressure Assessment

Room 602-603

The Puget Sound Partnership has undertaken a major project to evaluate pressures on the Sound’s marine, nearshore, freshwater, and terrestrial resources, and identify the critical ecosystem vulnerabilities that should be addressed to ensure sustainable long-term protection and recovery. The project is one of the priority science actions in the 2011-13 biennial science work plan, and was led by the Partnership’s Science Panel. The purpose of the 2014 Puget Sound Pressure Assessment is to create a more systematic and regionally accepted understanding of the pressures on the Puget Sound ecosystem and how and where the ecosystem is vulnerable to these pressures. It is intended to inform future decisions about what actions are most needed and how best to undertake Puget Sound protection and recovery. Vulnerability was assessed for stressor - ecosystem endpoint pairs by eliciting expert judgments about the functional impact, recovery time, and resistance of stressor effects on endpoints. Stressor intensity and endpoint distribution were separately characterized using either elicited expert judgments or GIS analysis as appropriate. Stressors represent documented, proximate causes of environmental change that capture a topic of concern identified in the Action Agenda or other applicable landscape assessment. Stressors included in this assessment were consistent with those presented in Puget Sound pressure taxonomy. Ecosystem endpoints are components or attributes of the ecosystem. Ecosystem endpoints were selected for three domains (terrestrial, freshwater, marine-nearshore). Vulnerability was assessed by eliciting expert judgments about and the strength of stressors expressed in geographic assessment units. Assessment units included 16 watersheds (using the areas defined for Chinook recovery planning) and seven marine basins (as defined by the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project). . Results calculated as potential impact of stressors, on endpoints, for individual assessment units can be combined in manifold ways to provide information about common themes and geographic differences in critical vulnerabilities. This presentation will share lessons learned from this complex project and assessment results