Type of Presentation

Oral

Session Title

Utilizing Green Infrastructure to improve Water Quality and Environmental Outcomes in the Urban Realm

Description

The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) negotiated a Consent Decree that establishes requirements for SPU’s Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reduction Program. The Consent Decree allows SPU to propose an Integrated Plan for implementing stormwater control projects in addition to CSO control measures outlined in a Long Term Control Plan. Development of an Integrated Plan provided the opportunity to propose stormwater and CSO project actions, prioritized and sequenced in order to achieve greater benefits for water quality of the receiving waters in and around Seattle than would otherwise be achieved with CSO investments alone and result in these improvements happening sooner. Seattle is one of the first cities in the country to have the opportunity to demonstrate an integrated and prioritized program of stormwater and CSO projects as part of a Consent Decree under EPAs Integrated Planning framework.

To develop the Integrated Plan, SPU first ranked its receiving water bodies based on the Consent Decree requirements. Next, SPU developed preliminary loads and cost estimates to identify potential stormwater projects to be implemented and CSO projects to be delayed. The CSO deferral candidates are detention projects while the candidate stormwater projects include a mix of green, gray, and programmatic measures.

SPU developed pollutant loads models and conducted exposure assessments to compare the water quality, human health and habitat benefits of each stormwater and CSO project, as required by the Consent Decree. SPU used multi-objective decision analysis (MODA) to help select the combination of stormwater projects and CSO deferrals that meets the Consent Decree requirements and supports SPUs triple bottom line decision making-- financial, environmental and social impacts and benefits. SPU assembled an independent Expert Panel to review and help refine the analytical methods and provide feedback on the results. The expected results are a significant improvement in overall pollutant load reductions in a shorter time frame than would have occurred.

The option to propose an Integrated Plan as part of the Long Term Control Plan is an exciting opportunity and SPU is well positioned to demonstrate the value of a more integrated approach for improved water quality that will result in larger improvements in wet weather discharges than would have occurred without the integrated approach.

This paper will present an overview of the process, some of the technical challenges and how they were overcome, and the resulting integrated plan. It will also discuss how such integrated planning could be utilized by other communities to prioritize water quality improvements more cost-effectively in Puget Sound/Salish Sea.

Comments

Link to SPU Integrated Plan:

http://www.seattle.gov/util/environmentconservation/projects/sewageoverflowprevention/integratedplan/

Link to SPU Integrated Plan Summary Fact Sheet:

https://pspwa.app.box.com/s/aqxb4i45t2c2aurndkaffbtjub17l1vm

Link to SPU Integrated Plan Background Summary

https://pspwa.app.box.com/s/fo7kv23erzryfqety8h8squul4zurrx7

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Accelerating Water Quality Improvements through Integrated Planning- Seattle's Integrated Plan

2016SSEC

The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) negotiated a Consent Decree that establishes requirements for SPU’s Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reduction Program. The Consent Decree allows SPU to propose an Integrated Plan for implementing stormwater control projects in addition to CSO control measures outlined in a Long Term Control Plan. Development of an Integrated Plan provided the opportunity to propose stormwater and CSO project actions, prioritized and sequenced in order to achieve greater benefits for water quality of the receiving waters in and around Seattle than would otherwise be achieved with CSO investments alone and result in these improvements happening sooner. Seattle is one of the first cities in the country to have the opportunity to demonstrate an integrated and prioritized program of stormwater and CSO projects as part of a Consent Decree under EPAs Integrated Planning framework.

To develop the Integrated Plan, SPU first ranked its receiving water bodies based on the Consent Decree requirements. Next, SPU developed preliminary loads and cost estimates to identify potential stormwater projects to be implemented and CSO projects to be delayed. The CSO deferral candidates are detention projects while the candidate stormwater projects include a mix of green, gray, and programmatic measures.

SPU developed pollutant loads models and conducted exposure assessments to compare the water quality, human health and habitat benefits of each stormwater and CSO project, as required by the Consent Decree. SPU used multi-objective decision analysis (MODA) to help select the combination of stormwater projects and CSO deferrals that meets the Consent Decree requirements and supports SPUs triple bottom line decision making-- financial, environmental and social impacts and benefits. SPU assembled an independent Expert Panel to review and help refine the analytical methods and provide feedback on the results. The expected results are a significant improvement in overall pollutant load reductions in a shorter time frame than would have occurred.

The option to propose an Integrated Plan as part of the Long Term Control Plan is an exciting opportunity and SPU is well positioned to demonstrate the value of a more integrated approach for improved water quality that will result in larger improvements in wet weather discharges than would have occurred without the integrated approach.

This paper will present an overview of the process, some of the technical challenges and how they were overcome, and the resulting integrated plan. It will also discuss how such integrated planning could be utilized by other communities to prioritize water quality improvements more cost-effectively in Puget Sound/Salish Sea.