Analysis of Lithics from Bone Processing and Lithic Tool Production Units at Woodstock Farm (45WH0055)

Research Mentor(s)

Campbell, Sarah

Description

This project analyzes lithics excavated from site 45WH0055, directly on Chuckanut Bay, Bellingham, Washington. The goal of our analysis was to determine if Ian Lewis’ 2013 thesis classification of activity areas was supported by type, quantity, and distribution of lithics. He hypothesized that two activity areas on the site were used for bone processing and lithic tool production with very little crossover. A separate goal of this project determined if the bone processing assemblage was most likely to be for butchering or bone tool production, a distinction not made in Lewis’ thesis. We analyzed each artifact based on technological attributes reflecting degree of modification and reduction stage, and classified lithics based on presence or absence of modification.

Document Type

Event

Start Date

17-5-2017 9:00 AM

End Date

17-5-2017 12:00 PM

Department

Anthropology

Genre/Form

student projects; posters

Subjects – Topical (LCSH)

Stone implements--Analysis; Tools, Prehistoric--Analysis; Excavations (Archaeology)--Washington (State)--Bellingham

Geographic Coverage

Bellingham (Wash.)

Type

Image

Rights

Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this documentation for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 17th, 9:00 AM May 17th, 12:00 PM

Analysis of Lithics from Bone Processing and Lithic Tool Production Units at Woodstock Farm (45WH0055)

This project analyzes lithics excavated from site 45WH0055, directly on Chuckanut Bay, Bellingham, Washington. The goal of our analysis was to determine if Ian Lewis’ 2013 thesis classification of activity areas was supported by type, quantity, and distribution of lithics. He hypothesized that two activity areas on the site were used for bone processing and lithic tool production with very little crossover. A separate goal of this project determined if the bone processing assemblage was most likely to be for butchering or bone tool production, a distinction not made in Lewis’ thesis. We analyzed each artifact based on technological attributes reflecting degree of modification and reduction stage, and classified lithics based on presence or absence of modification.