Policing protests, Active dissent
There is growing scholarly consensus that since the late 1990s democratic states have shifted in the ways they respond to protest. In the period between the 1970s and 1990s democratic states and their police often placed a premium on the protection of free speech and assembly rights, were relatively tolerant of disruptive protests, communicated openly with activists through an institutionalized permitting process, and showed restraint in the use of force and arrests. Things, however, have changed. Now democratic states selectively protect freedoms of speech and assembly, are less tolerant of disruption, face activists that believe the permitting process is illegitimate, and more readily use force and arrests. In Shutting Down the Streets, Amory Starr, Luis Fernandez, and Christian Scholl adeptly map the new contours of state efforts to control social movements in a global era.
American Journal of Sociology
Required Publisher's Statement
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Content provided by JSTOR,
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669056
Gillham, Patrick F., "Review of: Shutting Down the Streets: Political Violence and Social Control in the Global Era by Amory Starr, Luis Fernandez, and Christian Scholl" (2013). Sociology. 13.
Subjects - Topical (LCSH)
Social control; Community policing; Political participation
Subjects - Names (LCNAF)
Starr, Amory, 1968-. Shutting down the streets