Presentation Title

Protecting Eelgrass and Blue Carbon ecosystems

Session Title

The Role of Eelgrass Ecosystems in the Salish Sea

Conference Track

Habitat

Conference Name

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (2016 : Vancouver, B.C.)

Contributing Repository

Digital content made available by University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Type of Presentation

Oral

Abstract

Eelgrass ecosystems may rival rainforests in terms of their carbon sequestration abilities, despite their much smaller relative size. However, they are in widespread decline due to a myriad of anthropogenically driven changes. Loss of “blue carbon” ecosystems represent a reduction in the carbon sink and a source of carbon emissions to the atmosphere that are not currently accounted for. It also represents a loss of critical habitats for a number of marine and coastal species, reduced natural coastal defences and the many other significant services that these ecosystems provide.

Anthropogenically driven changes do not act in isolation but are cumulative and synergistic. Furthermore eelgrass is an ecosystem engineer, so drivers of change and ecosystem responses form complex feedback loops creating bistability in ecosystems and unpredictable non-linear responses to threats. The complexity of these interactions is a challenge for quantification of threats and ecosystem responses. This has so far hamstrung efforts to calculate the impact on the global carbon budget, and ultimately to protect and restore these ecosystems. While largely qualitative in nature, systems analyses can help us to identify the most pervasive anthropogenic impacts (those which affect eelgrass in the greatest number of ways), and potentially synergistic and ameliorative relationships between drivers and consequences. This can help us to better assess levels of risk and priorities for conservation. Such analyses suggest that threats to eelgrass ecosystems cannot be considered in isolation and must be addressed simultaneously, and offer practical recommendations including that equal efforts must be made to restore adjacent saltmarsh and riparian ecosystems. To adequately protect eelgrass full, spatial protection of healthy eelgrass ecosystems and the adjacent foreshore is recommended.

Rights

This resource is displayed for educational purposes only and may be subject to U.S. and international copyright laws. For more information about rights or obtaining copies of this resource, please contact University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9103, USA (360-650-7534; heritage.resources@wwu.edu) and refer to the collection name and identifier. Any materials cited must be attributed to the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference Records, University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

Type

Text

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Protecting Eelgrass and Blue Carbon ecosystems

2016SSEC

Eelgrass ecosystems may rival rainforests in terms of their carbon sequestration abilities, despite their much smaller relative size. However, they are in widespread decline due to a myriad of anthropogenically driven changes. Loss of “blue carbon” ecosystems represent a reduction in the carbon sink and a source of carbon emissions to the atmosphere that are not currently accounted for. It also represents a loss of critical habitats for a number of marine and coastal species, reduced natural coastal defences and the many other significant services that these ecosystems provide.

Anthropogenically driven changes do not act in isolation but are cumulative and synergistic. Furthermore eelgrass is an ecosystem engineer, so drivers of change and ecosystem responses form complex feedback loops creating bistability in ecosystems and unpredictable non-linear responses to threats. The complexity of these interactions is a challenge for quantification of threats and ecosystem responses. This has so far hamstrung efforts to calculate the impact on the global carbon budget, and ultimately to protect and restore these ecosystems. While largely qualitative in nature, systems analyses can help us to identify the most pervasive anthropogenic impacts (those which affect eelgrass in the greatest number of ways), and potentially synergistic and ameliorative relationships between drivers and consequences. This can help us to better assess levels of risk and priorities for conservation. Such analyses suggest that threats to eelgrass ecosystems cannot be considered in isolation and must be addressed simultaneously, and offer practical recommendations including that equal efforts must be made to restore adjacent saltmarsh and riparian ecosystems. To adequately protect eelgrass full, spatial protection of healthy eelgrass ecosystems and the adjacent foreshore is recommended.