Distribution of Large Woody Debris in Tidal Marshes

Presentation Abstract

Many tidal marsh restoration projects include large woody debris (LWD) supplementation, particularly in tidal channels. These projects assume that LWD plays a similar ecological and geomorphological role in tidal marshes as it does in rivers. However, in contrast to the fluvial literature, the literature on tidal marsh LWD is extremely sparse and provides no guidance on how much LWD normally occurs in tidal marshes, where it is located, how it behaves, or what its ecological and geomorphological role is. Consequently, it is unclear if restoration planners and engineers are putting too much, too little, or just the right amount of LWD in their projects, or if they are putting it in the right places and in the right manner. This contribution addresses this information gap and provide useful guidance for restoration planning and design by examining the distribution of LWD in tidal marshes of the Skagit, Snohomish, and Dosewallips river deltas. LWD distribution is affected by proximity to river distributaries, fetch, topography, vegetation, and dikes. LWD density and total length on the marsh surface scales allometrically with marsh area, while LWD density and total length in tidal channels scales negatively with channel size, except for the smallest channels which are too small to accommodate LWD.

Session Title

General Habitat Topics

Conference Track

Habitat

Conference Name

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (2016 : Vancouver, B.C.)

Document Type

Event

Start Date

2016 12:00 AM

End Date

2016 12:00 AM

Location

2016SSEC

Type of Presentation

Oral

Genre/Form

conference proceedings; presentations (communicative events)

Contributing Repository

Digital content made available by University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Subjects – Topical (LCSH)

Coarse woody debris--Management--Washington (State); Salt marshes--Management--Washington (State)

Geographic Coverage

Washington (State); Salish Sea (B.C. and Wash.)

Rights

This resource is displayed for educational purposes only and may be subject to U.S. and international copyright laws. For more information about rights or obtaining copies of this resource, please contact University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9103, USA (360-650-7534; heritage.resources@wwu.edu) and refer to the collection name and identifier. Any materials cited must be attributed to the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference Records, University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.

Type

Text

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 1st, 12:00 AM Jan 1st, 12:00 AM

Distribution of Large Woody Debris in Tidal Marshes

2016SSEC

Many tidal marsh restoration projects include large woody debris (LWD) supplementation, particularly in tidal channels. These projects assume that LWD plays a similar ecological and geomorphological role in tidal marshes as it does in rivers. However, in contrast to the fluvial literature, the literature on tidal marsh LWD is extremely sparse and provides no guidance on how much LWD normally occurs in tidal marshes, where it is located, how it behaves, or what its ecological and geomorphological role is. Consequently, it is unclear if restoration planners and engineers are putting too much, too little, or just the right amount of LWD in their projects, or if they are putting it in the right places and in the right manner. This contribution addresses this information gap and provide useful guidance for restoration planning and design by examining the distribution of LWD in tidal marshes of the Skagit, Snohomish, and Dosewallips river deltas. LWD distribution is affected by proximity to river distributaries, fetch, topography, vegetation, and dikes. LWD density and total length on the marsh surface scales allometrically with marsh area, while LWD density and total length in tidal channels scales negatively with channel size, except for the smallest channels which are too small to accommodate LWD.