Streaming Media

Presentation Abstract

Canopy-forming seaweeds provide shade for smaller algae and invertebrates in intertidal communities, ameliorating low tide abiotic stressors such as ultraviolet radiation, desiccation, and high temperatures. Conversely, canopies can negatively affect understory organisms by limiting settlement, causing physical disruption, and trapping sand. We examined the effect of Egregia menziesii, a canopy-forming foundation species, on intertidal communities, using manipulative experiments at Cattle Point, San Juan Island, WA. We hypothesized that plots with Egregia would have a higher abundance and richness of other invertebrates and algae than plots without Egregia. In the field, we set up 20 low intertidal plots, each 0.25m2 in size, where we randomly assigned the following four treatments (five replicates of each): Natural Egregia (no manipulation), –Egregia (Egregia removed), No-Natural Egregia (no manipulation), or +mimic Egregia (plastic Egregia mimic). We conducted community surveys of sessile and mobile organism cover/abundance for four seasons (Summer 2019, Winter 2020, Summer 2020, and Winter 2021). We also measured sand depth, temperature, and light intensity across treatments. Our data show significant temperature and light differences between plots with Egregia and without Egregia, confirming that Egregia can ameliorate heat stress when present. We predicted Egregia plots would trap more sand during the winter but have seen no strong evidence of sediment trapping in any treatment. Treatment and Season were both significant factors in determining community structure across the four seasons of data collection, but there were no significant differences in species richness indicating a similar number of species regardless of canopy cover.

Session Title

Poster Session 2: The Salish Sea Food Web and Cycles of Life

Conference Track

SSE14: Posters

Conference Name

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (2022 : Online)

Document Type

Event

SSEC Identifier

SSE-posters-237

Start Date

26-4-2022 4:30 PM

End Date

26-4-2022 5:00 PM

Rights

Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this document for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.

Type

Text

Language

English

COinS
 
Apr 26th, 4:30 PM Apr 26th, 5:00 PM

Impacts of Egregia menziesii, a foundational alga, on intertidal communities in the San Juan Islands

Canopy-forming seaweeds provide shade for smaller algae and invertebrates in intertidal communities, ameliorating low tide abiotic stressors such as ultraviolet radiation, desiccation, and high temperatures. Conversely, canopies can negatively affect understory organisms by limiting settlement, causing physical disruption, and trapping sand. We examined the effect of Egregia menziesii, a canopy-forming foundation species, on intertidal communities, using manipulative experiments at Cattle Point, San Juan Island, WA. We hypothesized that plots with Egregia would have a higher abundance and richness of other invertebrates and algae than plots without Egregia. In the field, we set up 20 low intertidal plots, each 0.25m2 in size, where we randomly assigned the following four treatments (five replicates of each): Natural Egregia (no manipulation), –Egregia (Egregia removed), No-Natural Egregia (no manipulation), or +mimic Egregia (plastic Egregia mimic). We conducted community surveys of sessile and mobile organism cover/abundance for four seasons (Summer 2019, Winter 2020, Summer 2020, and Winter 2021). We also measured sand depth, temperature, and light intensity across treatments. Our data show significant temperature and light differences between plots with Egregia and without Egregia, confirming that Egregia can ameliorate heat stress when present. We predicted Egregia plots would trap more sand during the winter but have seen no strong evidence of sediment trapping in any treatment. Treatment and Season were both significant factors in determining community structure across the four seasons of data collection, but there were no significant differences in species richness indicating a similar number of species regardless of canopy cover.