•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Rejoinder

Abstract

Colitti asserts the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in Saxe v. State College Area School District[1] (2001) maligned a Pennsylvania public school board’s well-intended anti-harassment policy, thereby denying “constitutional protection to minority groups, especially gays.” Colitti’s analysis reflects a misguided understanding of the federal judiciary’s duty to interpret and apply the U.S. Constitution and a myopic perspective of the Saxe opinion.

Genre/Form

articles

Subjects - Topical (LCSH)

Educational law and legislation--United States; Students--Legal status, laws, etc.--United States; School management and organization--United States; Education--Moral and ethical aspects--United States; Minorities--Civil rights--United States

Geographic Coverage

United States

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

Type

Text

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS