Document Type
Rejoinder
Abstract
Colitti asserts the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in Saxe v. State College Area School District[1] (2001) maligned a Pennsylvania public school board’s well-intended anti-harassment policy, thereby denying “constitutional protection to minority groups, especially gays.” Colitti’s analysis reflects a misguided understanding of the federal judiciary’s duty to interpret and apply the U.S. Constitution and a myopic perspective of the Saxe opinion.
Genre/Form
articles
Recommended Citation
Crawford, Jon G.
(2006)
"Saxe as an Erosion of Individual Protections: A Response to Colitti,"
Journal of Educational Controversy: Vol. 1:
No.
1, Article 13.
Available at:
https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol1/iss1/13
Subjects - Topical (LCSH)
Educational law and legislation--United States; Students--Legal status, laws, etc.--United States; School management and organization--United States; Education--Moral and ethical aspects--United States; Minorities--Civil rights--United States
Geographic Coverage
United States
Language
English
Format
application/pdf
Type
Text