Volume 5, Number 2 (2010) The Professions and Scholarly Communities: Creating the Public’s Questions and Understandings in the Public Square
Editorial
The Professions and Scholarly Communities: Creating the Public’s Questions and Understandings in the Public Square
Lorraine Kasprisin
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Articles in Response to Controversy
Privacy and Library Records, a Case Study in Whatcom County
Joan Airoldi and Daniel Larner
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Freedom Of Conscience and the Wall Of Separation
John F. Covaleskie
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
The Give Away Spirit: Reaching a Shared Vision of Ethical Indigenous Research Relationships
Jioanna Carjuzaa and J. Kay Fenimore-Smith
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Outsiders/Within and In/Outsiders: Varieties of Multiculturalism
Mary F. Rogers and Kathy McKibben Hoover
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Situating Our Racialized Beings in the Race Talk in the U.S.: African-born Blacks, Our Experience of Racialization, and Some Implications for Education
Rosaire I. Ifedi
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
High Stakes Motherhood and School Choice
Amy B. Shuffelton
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Ethical Breach and the Schizophrenic Process: Theorizing the Judge and the Teacher
Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer and Bryce Bartlett
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Waiting for Superman: He’s “Adequate” and Near Proficient!
Alice E. Ginsberg
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
About the Authors
About the Authors
Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Controversy Addressed in this Issue:
Professionals and scholarly communities in all fields bring a special
expertise to the discussion of ideas in the public square of a
democracy. At times, democratic decisions or views
widely held by the public conflict with sound professional knowledge of
the professional or scholarly community, and challenge the integrity of
the choices that a professional must make in a particular case. At
other times, the professional is faced with a conflict within the
profession itself between deeply entrenched traditions and the
challenges posed by newer paradigms. Under both circumstances, the
professional is left with a decision about the ethical path to follow
and the result will influence the public’s understanding and questions. This issue of the Journal of Educational Controversy examines
instances where professionals are faced with a dilemma that either pits
a democratic decision against the expertise of professional standards or
a conflict within the profession itself when traditional paradigms are
challenged. How does the professional examine the choices that
would have to be weighed and consider the most ethical position that
should be taken?