•  
  •  
 

Volume 5, Number 2 (2010) The Professions and Scholarly Communities: Creating the Public’s Questions and Understandings in the Public Square

Editorial

Articles in Response to Controversy

PDF

Privacy and Library Records, a Case Study in Whatcom County
Joan Airoldi and Daniel Larner
Vol. 5, Iss. 2

PDF

Freedom Of Conscience and the Wall Of Separation
John F. Covaleskie
Vol. 5, Iss. 2

PDF

Outsiders/Within and In/Outsiders: Varieties of Multiculturalism
Mary F. Rogers and Kathy McKibben Hoover
Vol. 5, Iss. 2

PDF

High Stakes Motherhood and School Choice
Amy B. Shuffelton
Vol. 5, Iss. 2

PDF

Ethical Breach and the Schizophrenic Process: Theorizing the Judge and the Teacher
Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer and Bryce Bartlett
Vol. 5, Iss. 2

About the Authors

PDF

About the Authors

Vol. 5, Iss. 2

Controversy Addressed in this Issue:
Professionals and scholarly communities in all fields bring a special expertise to the discussion of ideas in the public square of a democracy. At times, democratic decisions or views widely held by the public conflict with sound professional knowledge of the professional or scholarly community, and challenge the integrity of the choices that a professional must make in a particular case. At other times, the professional is faced with a conflict within the profession itself between deeply entrenched traditions and the challenges posed by newer paradigms. Under both circumstances, the professional is left with a decision about the ethical path to follow and the result will influence the public’s understanding and questions. This issue of the Journal of Educational Controversy examines instances where professionals are faced with a dilemma that either pits a democratic decision against the expertise of professional standards or a conflict within the profession itself when traditional paradigms are challenged. How does the professional examine the choices that would have to be weighed and consider the most ethical position that should be taken?