Presentation Abstract
Ecosystem recovery programs have a fundamental need for scientific evaluation. Evaluation outcomes are used to understand recovery progress, predict changes with changing climate conditions and dynamic socioeconomic systems, and provides the needed information for a sustainable and adaptable recovery effort. In the Puget Sound, ecosystem recovery is progressing, albeit more slowly than hoped, despite substantial investments made. Many monitored ecosystem indicators are not meeting recovery targets and salmon populations in the region show few signs of recovery. There is continued need for scientific evidence to improve clarity around critical decisions and ensure investments are effective and targeted to accomplish the transformational results needed for recovery. Integrating scientific findings into planning efforts helps ensure the accountability of actions, understand the effectiveness of those actions and investments made, and promotes the evaluation of recovery progress. Because linkages between recovery actions and ecosystem responses are complex, scientific evaluations of recovery progress can be very challenging. Most large-scale restoration programs focus on evaluating project-scale monitoring or use syntheses to address programmatic questions regarding recovery progress. While these approaches are common and provide information to guide recovery work at larger scales, alternative options exist for a more comprehensive assessment. This session will consist of presenting innovative, evidence-based approaches to evaluating progress toward ecosystem recovery, specifically the quantification of cumulative effects produced by multiple recovery actions across landscapes. Presentations will include the introduction and application of an evidence-based evaluation of cumulative effects in large scale systems, a flexible and innovative methodology for synthesizing and assessing the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration actions at various scales. The question and answer portion will focus on how restoration benefits are evaluated and discuss the role of these evaluations in addressing programmatic questions associated with the adaptive management of large-scale ecosystem restoration as well as natural management and policy implications.
Session Title
Evaluation Tools to Assess Recovery Progress (Panel)
Conference Track
SSE1: Science for the Future
Conference Name
Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (2022 : Online)
Document Type
Event
SSEC Identifier
SSE-panels-141
Start Date
26-4-2022 11:30 AM
End Date
26-4-2022 1:00 PM
Type of Presentation
Oral
Genre/Form
conference proceedings; presentations (communicative events)
Contributing Repository
Digital content made available by University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.
Subjects – Topical (LCSH)
Restoration ecology--Washington (State)--Puget Sound; Evaluation--Methodology; Ecosystem management--Washington (State)--Puget Sound
Geographic Coverage
Salish Sea (B.C. and Wash.); Puget Sound (Wash.)
Rights
Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this document for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.
Type
Text
Language
English
Format
application/pdf
Included in
Fresh Water Studies Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons
Evaluation tools to assess recovery progress and the adaptation of future efforts.
Ecosystem recovery programs have a fundamental need for scientific evaluation. Evaluation outcomes are used to understand recovery progress, predict changes with changing climate conditions and dynamic socioeconomic systems, and provides the needed information for a sustainable and adaptable recovery effort. In the Puget Sound, ecosystem recovery is progressing, albeit more slowly than hoped, despite substantial investments made. Many monitored ecosystem indicators are not meeting recovery targets and salmon populations in the region show few signs of recovery. There is continued need for scientific evidence to improve clarity around critical decisions and ensure investments are effective and targeted to accomplish the transformational results needed for recovery. Integrating scientific findings into planning efforts helps ensure the accountability of actions, understand the effectiveness of those actions and investments made, and promotes the evaluation of recovery progress. Because linkages between recovery actions and ecosystem responses are complex, scientific evaluations of recovery progress can be very challenging. Most large-scale restoration programs focus on evaluating project-scale monitoring or use syntheses to address programmatic questions regarding recovery progress. While these approaches are common and provide information to guide recovery work at larger scales, alternative options exist for a more comprehensive assessment. This session will consist of presenting innovative, evidence-based approaches to evaluating progress toward ecosystem recovery, specifically the quantification of cumulative effects produced by multiple recovery actions across landscapes. Presentations will include the introduction and application of an evidence-based evaluation of cumulative effects in large scale systems, a flexible and innovative methodology for synthesizing and assessing the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration actions at various scales. The question and answer portion will focus on how restoration benefits are evaluated and discuss the role of these evaluations in addressing programmatic questions associated with the adaptive management of large-scale ecosystem restoration as well as natural management and policy implications.
