Senior Project Advisor
Jared Hardesty
Document Type
Project
Publication Date
Spring 2025
Keywords
Alien and Sedition Acts, consolidated power, Constitution, early republic, federal power, natural rights, popular sovereignty, states’ rights, strict construction, tyranny
Abstract
This paper examines St. George Tucker’s 1799 pamphlet, Letter to a Member of Congress; Respecting the Alien Sedition Laws, as a distinctive constitutional critique of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. While less famous than Thomas Jefferson's and James Madison’s politically oriented writings, Tucker’s response provided a distinctly legalistic case for the unconstitutionality of the Alien and Sedition Acts. The acts were greatly threatening to Tucker, who saw them as overreaches of federal power for their attempts to subvert constitutional protections for non-citizens and freedom of speech in the name of national security. For Tucker, allowing for the freest extent of civil liberties was necessary in a representative republic, where people ought to challenge their elected officials. This critique emphasized the limitations of power rather than its applications, demonstrating Tucker’s distrust of consolidated authority that arose from his experiences in the United States’s formative decades: being tutored in the law by one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, serving in the Revolutionary War, and participating in the Annapolis convention as a delegate from Virginia. While the Alien and Sedition Acts expired after the turn of the century, Tucker, then a professor of law, published a five-volume reprinting of Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, with particular emphasis placed on the divergence between English and American law. By employing some of the same critiques he applied to the Alien and Sedition Acts, as well as those of Jefferson and Madison, Tucker successfully managed to establish the legal framework for an oppositional constitutional tradition for opposing federal power on the grounds of limited government, preservation of states’ rights, protection for civil liberties, and belief in popular sovereignty and free political discourse.
[An annotated bibliography is included as a supplementary file.]
Department
History
Recommended Citation
Dopps, Logan, "St. George Tucker’s Letter to a Congressman: A Virginia Judge's Critique of the Alien and Sedition Acts" (2025). WWU Honors College Senior Projects. 938.
https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/938
Type
Text
Rights
Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this document for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author’s written permission.
Language
English
Format
application/pdf
Annotated Bibliography