The vast majority of theses in this collection are open access and freely available. There are a small number of theses that have access restricted to the WWU campus. For off-campus access to a thesis labeled "Campus Only Access," please log in here with your WWU universal ID, or talk to your librarian about requesting the restricted thesis through interlibrary loan.

Date of Award

Summer 2025

Document Type

Doctoral Dissertation

Department or Program Affiliation

Woodring College of Education

Degree Name

Doctorate of Education

Department

Education Leadership and Inclusive Teaching

First Advisor

Bruce, Tim (Professor)

Second Advisor

Makoyiisaaminaa, Will

Third Advisor

Kuss-Cybula, Michelle

Abstract

Washington State’s Teacher Principal Evaluation Program (TPEP) was established to support both educator accountability and professional growth through a structured evaluation process. Since its statewide implementation, TPEP has required educators to be assessed on eight criteria, incorporate student growth goals, and be evaluated through one of three state-approved instructional frameworks. While the policy framework is intended to standardize and elevate evaluation practices, its application has proven to be inconsistent across districts and even between schools within the same district. Teachers and principals often experience varying levels of support, feedback, and expectations depending on the evaluation framework in use and the leadership style of the building principal.

This qualitative study explores stakeholder perceptions of TPEP’s effectiveness through semi-structured interviews with 18 participants across six school districts in Washington. Using a multiple case study design, the research identifies key themes including rater reliability, the burden of evidence collection, principal workload, and the influence of differing evaluation models. Findings indicate that while TPEP is indeed a powerful tool for instructional growth, its impact is significantly shaped by local implementation practices. Participants consistently highlighted the need for stronger evaluator training and more time for meaningful observation and feedback. Additionally, a key recommendation emerging from the study is the adoption of a single, statewide instructional framework to reduce variability and promote consistency in teacher evaluations. By addressing these implementation challenges, the state can more effectively leverage TPEP as a system that supports both teacher development and improved student learning outcomes.

Type

Text

Keywords

Teacher Evaluation, TPEP, OSPI, Washington State, Danielson, Marzano, Center for Educational Leadership

Publisher

Western Washington University

OCLC Number

1531051419

Subject – LCSH

Teacher effectiveness--Washington (State)--Evaluation; Teachers--Rating of--Washington (State); School principals--Rating of--Washington (State); Educational evaluation--Washington (State); Educational accountability--Washington (State)--Evaluation; Education--Standards--Washington (State); Career development--Washington (State)--Evaluation

Geographic Coverage

Washington (State)

Format

application/pdf

Genre/Form

masters theses

Language

English

Rights

Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this document for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author’s written permission.

Download

Share

COinS